Triplex Confinium Sub-Project
Drava Valley Multiple Borderlands
Contacts:
Hrvoje Petrić, MA, h.petric@inet.hr
Prof. Dr. Mira Kolar-Dimitrijević, Professor Emeritus, mira.kolar@zg.htnet.hr
Mira Kolar-Dimitrijević - Hrvoje Petrić
MULTIPLE
BORDERS
OF PODRAVINA REGION
APPROACHES, OBJECTS AND METHODS OF RESEARCH
Summary
Key words: River
Drava, Comparative History, Environmental History
What is Podravina multiple-bordered region?
Podravina
multiple-bordered region[1]
should primarily envelop the mid-stream of River Drava (with affluent
streams - Dravinja, Pesnica, Mura and their affluent streams, Bednja, etc.)
and the gravitating areas: Southern Styria (around Maribor, a region in
Slovenia called "Spodnje Podravlje s Prlekijo" - around Ptuj, Ormož
and Ljutomer), southern parts of the then Hungarian counties – Vas-Željezno
(with Mura region), Zala (with Međimurje and Prekomurje), Somogy (with
Prekodravlje), northern part of Croato-Slavonnian
counties - Križevačka (later on, Bjelovarsko-križevačka) and Varaždinska,
the area of Slavonnian Military Border, i.e. Varaždin Generalate –
primarily Đurđevačka, Križevačka, Koprivnička and Ivanićka
Captaincies, later on Đurđevačka and Križevačka Regiments, as well as
the areas under the Ottoman Empire – Požeški, Pakrački (Cernički, Čazmanski)
and Kaniški sandjak, sub-provinces
(in earlier, and in later periods as well, Virovitička and
Baranjska counties).
Beside
the areas mentioned, the term ‘Podravina multiple-bordered region’ in
some aspects could be extended to the region of River Drava lower stream
(what we today call Slavonija and Baranja in Croatia, and eastern parts of
Hungarian TransDanube-Prekodunavlje). This is where Drava flows into the
Danube with an array of specific characteristics, relating to what we call
Podravina multiple-bordered region (which nevertheless gravitates to
mid-stream of River Drava and its affluents). This is why we should pay
special attention and dedicate separate research to this Danube
multiple-bordered region as well (focused on Baranja, Croatian and
Vojvodina’s Danube region).
We
need to stress out that certain research tasks within Podravina
multiple-bordered region will sometimes need to be compared to processes
undergoing along upper Drava flow, that belongs to Tirol (around
Lienz) and Corinthia (towns Spittal an der Drau, Villach/Beljak, Ferlach, Völkermarkt/Velikovec,
Dravograd etc.) on the Austrian side, and areas around Drava source (with
colorful town of Toblach/Dobbiaco and an old Benedictine abbey and an urban
core Innichen /San Candido) today situated in Italian province of Trentino -
Alto Adige. A research should be directed at River Drava affluent streams
– just like midstream of Mura – all the way to areas around Graz,
Austria.
Podravina
multiple-bordered region is where Peripannonian and Prealps regions meet,
one of the areas where the Hapsburg and the Ottoman Empires met. Parts of
these regions from 16th century formed military border areas
(Croato-Slavonnian, Hungarian and Ottoman Military Borders), with all their
individual characteristics. There is evidence of closeness between these two
empires, the Hapsbrug and the Ottoman, regardless of their mutual hostility.
Both empires had their own parallel power structures, which could be
compared and distringuished. On one hand, both empires had permanent
interests in hegemony within their own borders, creating permanent imperial
hostilities in the East (i.e. Persia), and different ones in the West (i.e.
France). Whenever it was in their common interest in situations that such
conflicts arised, the Hapsburg and the Ottoman Empires had understanding for
each other, rather than to ignore common interests because of religious,
moral values or other principles. This is why their contacts in/at Podravina
multiple-bordered region were explored as imperial subordination, but always
with complex multi-layered historic reality, either through expressed wish
of the population here, or without it, always present in their everyday
lives. Beside the contacts of the Hapsburg and the Ottoman Empires, the
region had been subjected to contacts with other Hapsburg Empire nations, as
well as those under the crown of St. Stjepan (Croatian Kingdom on one side,
and Hungarian Kingdom on the other side). By withdrawing the Ottoman Empire
borderline to the south (after the Karlovac Peace Accord in 1699), the
entire area of Podravina multiple-bordred region was included into the
Hapsburg Monarchy. From within, it represented itself a contact area between
the Military Border, Hungary, civil, non-military part of Croatia and
Styria. In any case, Podravina multiple-bordered region, throughout the
early New Era, could be considered a greater area of Triplex Conifinium or
Triborder of Hapsburg, Ottoman and Venetian border regions, or at least its
“northern part”.[2]
Necessary
research of Podravina multiple-bordred region
Within
the historic context, this area along the rivers Drava, Mura and their
affluent streams has never been studied as a whole, a region where many
influences intertwined. There is a wonderful opportunity to study this
region, especially by taking an environmental- and/or economic-historical
approach, not excluding other possible approaches.
Research
of Podravina multiple-bordered region[3]
aimed at linking all research potentials from all banks of River Drava (left
and right, upstream and downstream – including Drava affluent streams),
but also the widest connection of nations, people, settlements and
environment in order to help build a joint European comparative history of
Podravina. However, there are a number of research projects of the wider
environment of this multiple-bordered region, especially at Mogersdorf
International cultural/historical symposium (Modinci). By getting in touch,
additional research, collaboration and co-ordination of research topics and
subjects to be presented at international scientific symposiums – we can
explore common background of our cultures and integrations, particularly
those influenced by religion or the military. Research should include
researchers from Austria, Hungary, Slovenia and Croatia and those from other
nations as well (ie. Hungarians, Austrians, Slovenes, Serbs, Jews, Slovaks,
Czechs, Macedonians, Italians, Germans etc). For example, in Koprivnica and
Varaždin in 18th century we had very strong groups of Orthodox
traders, originating from the Europe’s Southeast; the greater area of
Koprivnica and Križevci had an earlier coming of relatively numerous rural
Orthodox population of Vlach. Residence
and activities of German officers and soldiers from various parts of the
Monarchy left a trace in social structures, everday life and some families
in the entire area, which is particularly noticeable in family names of
people here (for example, Socialist Rep.of Croatia’s Lexicon of names,
issue Zagreb, 1976.).
Based
on these integrations, it’s possible to explain everyday behaviour of
people in this region, being relatively more tolerant to others, not only in
culture, but also in customs, most certainly influenced the topography
characteristics, and also the fact that the ties did not depend on warring,
but on necessity of living together and creating new social values.
Borderline
on River Drava (except for the period from mid-16th till the end
of 17th century when Drava represented the imperial river border
between the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman Empires) all the way to 1918
was being the line that united, not divided people. For example, The Viceroy
Jelačić in 1848 had to use all his skills and strength to keep parts of
this region from drowning in the Hungarian revolution.
The same applies to Protestantism, which was more deeply rooted in
this region than in some other areas. We can trace as easily the influences
in lifestyles and economy, when Hungarian, Austrian and Slovenian influences
were unstoppable. This can be seen in cultural objects "in situ"
and in languages, especially in names of tools and household objects. We can
also find isolated "islands" which applied mighty resistance to
any foreign influence, keeping their own traditional culture. Also, it’s
important to stress that this region was subject of meddle and influences by
different cultures at the same time.
Podravina in a strict sense
– a core of Podravina multiple-bordered region
The central research of Podravina
multiple-bordered region refers to Podravina in a strict, narrow sense of
the word. In contrast to its geographic term, it applies to a narrower area,
or rather, areas which gravitate to towns of Ludbreg, Koprivnica and Đurđevac.
Varaždin area, more to the west, is called
«varaždinština», and in regional sense – the population there
does not feel Podravina people themselves. To the east of Đurđevac,
approximately from Pitomača to the east, there is Slavonnia, enveloping a
great part of Podravina, yet population there feel and call themselves
Slavonnians.
Podravina
(in its narrow sense; hereinaafter Podravina) refers to the area between
River Drava on the north, foothills of Bilogora, or northern parts of Kalnik
hills on the south. As a cultural-historical term, Podravina was created in
the late MiddleAges. An older, today completely vanished regional term for
Podravina - was Komarnica. Until the mid-14th century, on
today’s territory of Podravina, there was Komarnička county, which was
later on included into Križevačka
county. What was left of it, was only the name -
Komarnica Archdeaconry, as a part of Zagreb diocese. By the beginning
of 16th century, the administrative and cultural term
“Komarnica” was turned into Podravina.
For example, a Vienna university student, Stjepan
from Struga, in 1516 declared himself as a «Podrawiczs», which indicates a
seed of future cultural-historical term of Podravina (region and people);
the same term at the same time describes northern territory along Drava of
Križevačka County (i.e. the former areas of Komarnica County).
Eastern
cultural borders of Podravina formed with the Hapsburg - Ottoman
demarcations, defining the term “Podravina” today as areas, are
identical to those that were left over in the Varaždin Generalate (its
eastern border identical to medieval border between Križevačka and
Virovitička Counties). At the same time, a part of Križevačka County
alongside River Drava (around Ludbreg) is called Podravina district. This is
when the late MiddleAges and early New Era
defined Podravina in today’s sense of the word. In 16th
century, it includes Koprivnička and Đurđevačka Captaincy in the
military border area, and in its provincial part it included Podravina
district of Križevačka County. Even today, the local population of the
region feels like Podravina people, almost exclusively here, even though
other areas upstream and downstream people have kept strong connection to
River Drava.
In
military border area, from 16th century the center of the region
were the town of Koprivnca and a fortification / trading place of Đurđevac,
with Ludbreg coming up as a provincial center. So, it was more than four
centuries ago, when three main financial-functional centers of Podravina
were formed, thus today we speak of Ludbreg’s, Koprivnica’s and Đurđevac’s
Podravina. After meandering of River Drava in 1710, an important marketplace
Legrad was physically moved from Međimurje to Podravina, yet Legrad never
developed into the fourth Podravina pillar, slowly lagging behind which
eventually resulted in its transition from an urban, into a rural
settlement. In 17th century, almost enture Podravina was a
borderline area on the outside borders between the Hapsburg and the Ottoman
Empires, as the eastern areas (around Virovitica) were engulfed by the
Ottoman’s Požeška sub-province, or sandjak,
with territories north of Drava (around
Nagykanizsa) forming Kaniški sandjak
Podravina
multiple-bordered region in historiography
The
area of greater Podravina multiple-bordered region in historiography, except
for Mogersdorf scientific papers, became important factor only after the end
of World War Two, when periodical scientific papers were being published
first – Koprivnica Museum publication, Varaždin Museum publication,
Podravina Anthology Museum bulletin, Podravina historical bulletin, etc.,
when various publications and monograph books, other than simple calendars,
were being published. Although they all were focused on 20th
century, more and more earlier history was unstoppably surfacing, to bring
eventful, uneven past. Free
royal boroughs, towns with royal charters, like Varaždin, Koprivnica and
Križevci, military regiments like Đurđevačka and Križevačka, civil,
non-military areas within Križevačka and Varaždinska counties, with large
estates in Martijanec, Ludbreg, Veliki Bukovec, Rasinja, vicinity of Varaždin,
Trakošćan, in southern Styria, in
Prekomurje, Međimurje, as well as in areas within Hungarian counties -
Željezno (Vas), Zala, Šomođ (Somogy) and Baranja. They all became
subjects of numerous studies, research made both by historians and those who
were in possession of historic documents.
It resulted in relatively large number of published monograph books
of different quality, with too little publicized sources.
Today, those studies need to be additionally
verified and updated, revalued and reinterpreted, and documents written in kaj-dialect,
in languages like Slovenian, Hungarian, German and Latin require special
research.
In doing so, we probably will be confronted with
problems of different language problems, meddle or blending, tampering in
language, and the facts those documents speak of, hence, in the very content
of these documents.[4]
Modern, contemporary research of demographic
changes, based on birth, death and marriage records, is in its early stage,
as well as research of cadaster and land registry books. Although some of
these sources have been preserved only in fragments, the saved material will
no doubt reveal a strong genetic and cultural blending, rooted in the need
for practical everyday life.
Research plan
The
first stage of research we need to register all known established or
researched data, by creating a bibliography of all published papers, works,
essays and monograph books.[5]
In research of archives, we need to make regestas (copies) of documents,
lists of funds and archives, and their contents. It all needs to be
publicized to make it available to as many researchers as possible. Besides,
it is important to have a consistent popularization of research results,
which can be supported by help of historic societies of Koprivnica and Križevci
etc.[6]
Taking
into consideration the existing structure of researchers, we need to
continue with already started research of early New Era (approx. 16-18th
century period), as well as the 19th century, not disregarding
topics from MiddleAges research already in progress, or the 20th
century itself. The group work should be directed towards environmental
history, demography, religion, administration, education, agrarian reform,
traffic, urban tradition, trading, military, cartography, industry and
culture as parts of history. A
part of research could be created along the way. Perhaps it is necessary to
mention that in Rep. of Croatia there is more than a hundred individuals,
with research that could be linked in some way to this particular research;
these researchers should be contacted, connected and directed towards the
same scientific goal, if possible.
Beside these researchers, there are potential researchers in Austria, Slovenia, Hungary and other countries.
Podravina
multi-bordered region between micro- and macro-history
Podravina multiple-bordered region is a complicated area of research, as each of the problems tied to it is structurally complex. First of all, it takes an approach for “history from below” but at the same time a completely different one “history from above”, while each approach represents multiple crossing of both strategies. History of Podravina multiple-bordered region has to be recognizable in its imperial horizons (loosely, “from the above”), but primarily in its own environment in historic sense of the word (loosely, “from the below”).[7] It should correspond to research of history of the Habsburg and the Ottoman Empires, but also represent the history of nations in Podravina multiple-bordered region - nations like Croats, Slovenes, Serbs, Hungarians and Austrians. A review of researchers’ issues should definitely have the following viewpoints:
1. Podravina multiple-bordered region and environmental history
This
type of research would be occupied with Podravina multiple-bordered region
in terms of its openness to Pannonian Valley, towards the Alps, but also
towards Dinara Mountain and the Adriatic Sea. Although the Habsburg Monarchy
was primarily an alpine and/or mountain area, while the Ottoman Empire was
primarily Dinara- and Balkan-based, both empires had reached beyond single
identification; this applied even more so for their respective subjects,
people in Podravina multiple-bordered region, being a contact area between
the Pannonian Valley and the Alps, opened towards Dinara and the Adriatic
Sea. Although the environmental history research in this area is in its
early, beginning stage, we can already see clear advance in this respect.[8]
It’s a great challenge to have a transdisciplinary research of economic
history[9]
and environmental history of these areas.[10]
2. Podravina multiple-bordered region in between Podunavlje (the Danube
region), the Alps and the Adriatic Sea regions
The
research here should cover not only the historic-geographic characteristics
or features throughout centuries, pointing out to most important directions
in development processes, but also diversity and blending of these
mezoregions. A special attention should be paid to rivers Drava and Mura and
their affluent streams, showing advantages and/or drawbacks, processing all
relevant "push" and "pull" factors.
3. History of Podravina multiple-bordered region in view of civilizational
and cultural paradigm of the Ottoman Empire and Habsburg Monarchy
4. Medieval heritage – establishing and reconstruction of medieval
toponymy and topography in Podravina multiple-bordered region, as a
contribution to historic-geographic research
The
rich, historic sources for medieval topography and toponymy of areas along
River Drava and its affluent streams are still widely unresearched and
unused. Majority of sources is being kept at Croatia’s State Archives,
Archbishop’s and Cathedral archives, and HAZU archives in Zagreb, at
Regional archives of Maribor, various archives in Ljubljana, at Hungary’s
State Archives in Budapest, Austrian archives etc.
A comprehensive analysis of these sources (use of field research with
mapping – finding about today’s toponyms through systematic work –
(from a village to a village, from a field to a field etc., with using early
medieval sources of similar status (especially cartographc), it’s possible
to reach a reconstruction of medieval toponymy and topography, which is very
important if we want to know spatial environment of this region.
5. Creation, development and disappearance of late medieval urban
settlements in the territory of Podravina multiple-bordered region
Podravina
multiple-bordered region in late
medieval times had several urban settlements with the same characteristics,
ie. townsquare, market-place or free royal borough charter. Research of
their creation, development, stagnation and/or disappearance would
contribute to research of urban history in its European context. Here we
need to question terminology, creation of central functions (through church,
trade fairs, non-agrarian activities, fortification – as outer shields
and/or town cores), culture and administration, as well as social conflicts
and demographic flows, as much as possible, based on available sources. It
should research as much as possible the then existing medieval urban
societies.
6. Communication and ties of Podravina multiple-bordered region with other
regions in late Medieval and early New Era
The
communication primarily refers to individual communication of individuals
and their relationships, or mobility of individuals. Research of historic
sources should be directed at personal ties to surrounding areas within a
single social entity, and such ties outside the area of Podravina
multiple-bordered region. Particular
attention should be paid to intellectual communication(s) of students from
Podravina multiple-bordered region, studying at European universities (the
subject covered in relatively small scope).
In particular, the universities that should be covered are those in
Vienna, Graz, Padua, Bologna, Krakow, Trnava etc. Also, we need to consider
marginal groups like pilgrims, travelers, soldiers, etc. We should also
include internal migrations and mobilities of different social groups and
individuals within the area of Podravina multiple-bordered region.
The
focus of this research should be on external migrations, but it should also
cover internal migrations between certain micro-groups of Podravina
multiple-bordered region as a historic mezoregion. It should cover mass
migrations to overseas lands, but also to other European countries as well.
Research should, as much as sources would permit, cover individuals and
larger groups who participated in changes and migrations of population.
8. Thorough changes in spatial migration density and population of Podravina
multiple-bordered region
This
research should include history and geography aspects, as well as
historic-demographic nature of changes in spatial population density and in
structure of population of Podravina multiple-bordered region, based on
relatively rich sources preserved. It’s the “long-lasting” aspects,
from the period prior to the armed conflicts between the Habsburg and the
Ottoman Empires, during the conflicts and into the processes of recuperation
and rebuilding, all up to new resettlements
(in the 19th century). In this research we should not
forget the fact that it’s a very long period of time – around four
centuries long – in which numerous migrations had occurred, affecting
today’s population, settlement charts and structure of inhabitants
in Podravina multiple-bordered region.
In the period from 15th to 20th
century, the agrarian societies and agricultural production had been exposed
to the most different changes. This research should aim at studying and
comparing these agrarian societies, their growth and development, their
agricultural production in western (civil) and eastern (military) parts of
Podravina multiple-bordered region, what differences anmd similarities they
had between them, what level of communication they had, how their agrarian
relations influenced growth (or decline) of agricultural production, what
effects farming innovations had in the east and the west of Podravina
multiple-bordered region, what kind of structure of agrarian families they
had then, what differences and/or similarities in everday life, in
mentalities of people, etc. Before all that, we should undertake a number of
microhistroric studies of agrarian history.
10. Urban and "partially urban" societies in early New Era
Research
of early New Era urban history
11. Traffic alongside rivers Drava and Mura on both sides, the right and the
left banks; Rivers Drava and Mura as navigable pathways
Traffic
was extremely important component of everday life in this region. Research
should include separate studies of road, river and railway traffic, with
different transport vehicles, ferries and boats. Also, we should target
government authorities and their attitude toward traffic in different
periods, with different state goals were aimed to be fulfilled etc.
12. Crafts, trades, industrialization and financial institutions of
Podravina multiple-bordered region
Participants
in crafts, trades, industrialization and financial transactions are
important targets of research, as well as the goods being manufactured and
traded with. It should be interesting to research the prices of goods in
those days, trade fairs in marketplaces and towns, as well as at feudal
estates, reforms in trade fairs, local legislation and regulations. Research
should process difficulties in crafts, trades, industry and financial
transactions.
13. Military Order administration, functioning of free royal boroughs and
towns, rural administration, regions, counties and sub-counties
Here
we should target the existing domestic and foreign influences in building
administrative systems. We should have a nation-wide analysis of town
administration, clerks, regulations, and
guidelines imposed vertically “from the above”, as well as
requests and demands “from the below”, plus the efficiency
(inefficiency) in those administrative systems.
14. Feudal estates and manors on a greater area of Podravina
multiple-bordered region
Research
of feudal estates and manors in a greater Podravina multiple-bordered region could provide a wide range of responses on social, demographic and
economic changes of vital importance in these areas; we should research
their further growth after 18th century as a proto-modernization
in these areas. Here we have, in better or worse shape, preserved documents
that cover feudal estates and manors. By using a comparative method of
ownership structure comparison in Croatian, Styrian and Hungarian regions we
can have a multitude of research results.[11]
15. Ethno-confessional changes in Podravina multiple-bordered region in
early New Era (Catholic Church, Orthodox Church, Protestants, Greek
Catholics, Judaism, Islam, Atheism)
In
the second half of 16th century, we had Protestants and Orthodox
population arriving at the same time here. In 17th century, an
important issue here was the church union and processes of Catholic revival.
We should organize systematic research of growth of Catholic and Orthodox
Church infrastructures in 17th and 18th centuries, but
also the coming of Jews. The role of Catholic Church should be examined and
researched. This should lead to better understanding of interrelations
between different faiths and churches in this region in early New Era, their
“image in the eyes of other denominations” etc.
In
this research, we can apply comparative studies between urban and rural
societies, between the east and the west, between lowlands and highlands.
This is ethnic confessional history of this region in early New Era’s
socio-cultural, socioeconomic, ethnolignuistic and ethnoconfessional
integrational and dissintegrational processes of Croats, Serbs, Hungarians,
Slovenians, Austrians, Jews and others within the Habsburg and the Ottoman
Empires. Also, we should research and process organization of religious
institutions, building of churches and networks of church institutions,
ideologies, intertwining of economic and religious interests, life of these
structures and who changed them etc.[12]
16. Religious conversions in Podravina multiple-bordered region
This
part of research should concentrate on people’s religious attitudes,
confessions, state interests and religious identities. Podravina
multiple-bordered region is the area where, from early New Era (from a
Slav/Balkans side in church relations) there was one of historically deepest
penetrations of Orthodox Christianity into the West; from that time onwards,
one of historically deepest limited penetrations of Islam (vicinity of Kaniža,
Prekodravlje, Virovitica etc).
17. Comparative research of length and changes in sociodemographic and
ethnodemographic structures of Podravina multiple-bordered region
Historic
demography is very important for having knowledge on processes which were
undergoing in the period from mid 17th century until the end of
19th century in Podravina multiple-bordered region.
Historic-demographic studies should be based on processing and analysis of
registers of births, deaths and marriages. The oldest records preserved date
back to mid 17th century. Beside birth, death and marriage
records, we should use other available sources – military records
listings, cannonic visitations, landlords’ records of feudal estates,
documentation of towns and marketplaces.
The focus of these historic-demographic studies
shoud be on comparison between the civic and military parts; we could
compare demographic processes between urban and rural settlements, different
spatial areas within Podravina multiple-bordered region etc.
18. Development of education and literacy, book-reading in population of
Podravina multiple-bordered region in comparative research
Although
the first data on school system of this region date back to 1480 (Varaždinske
Toplice), 1582 (Lepoglava – comprehensive school), 1588 (Varaždin), 1590
(Koprivnica) and around 1640 (Drnje, Ivanec, Štrigova, Prelog, Selnica,
Belica, Donji Vidovec, Murska Sobota, Mursko Središče, Nedelišče), 1645
(Ruše nearby Maribor) etc, more historic data on schools (primarily church
schools) are from 18th century. Research of these should focus on
school infrastructure development, as well as on application of laws, based
on comparative research of school systems in civic and military parts of
Podravina multiple-bordered region. We could study an increase in school
attendance and literacy, and the efforts and methods of growth of educationl
systems. We should also analyse the language of documents, and compare
education under the church wing to the state-provided education.
19. Legal system in between Hungarian and Austrian law
We
should process differences in application of different legal systems of
Hungarian and Austrian law, as well as the influence it had on different
social structures.
20. Wars, military organizations and Military Border defense systems in
Podravina multiple-bordered region
This
research should, among other things, make a comparison of different defense
systems existing in Podravina multiple-bordered region. The studies here
should compare Military Border systems within the Habsburg and the Ottoman
Empires along rivers Drava and Mura. Also, it should process relations
between areas (and human societies and settlements) in immediate vicinity or
inside Military Border defense systems, with rear areas and vice-versa.
Besides, it should be researched how military reorganization
influenced a choice of work, occupation and interrelations (i.e.
friendships, conflicts), on building of settlements etc.
21. Culture and customs of Podravina multiple-bordered region
Studies of customs started in early 20th
century, based on guidelines made by Antun Radić, who was secretary of
Matica hrvatska at the time). What has been published until today by
professional ethnographs or plebeian writers (collectors) is quite an opus,
which cannot be neglected in search of a pattern and origins of behaviour
for a certain social group. A rich opus of folk tale, songs, dances, often
originating in cultures of other nations, rooted in this region, bring
attention of ethnography and musicology experts for decades, but should also
be subjects of research by historians too, who could find elements of
penetration, introduction and creation of a new, wider culture, or simply
taking over other nations’ values as their own, with retrograde effect of
giving own culture to others. Cultural heritage of this region is vast and
very rich, yet not fully researched or recognized as a wholesome European
culture, of Central European values. Research should probe into unity and
differences in popular culture, religious and regional differences,
traditional culture and its various forms, carnivals, myths and customs.
Special attention should be paid to changes in popular culture and social
changes.
22. Cultural - historical monuments in Podravina multiple-bordered region
This
research should cover studies of existing cultural-historical material
heritage (i.e. administrative buildings, urban and rural family homes,
castles, manors, parks, church and military buildings, etc.), as well as
that part of material heritage that no longer exists (i.e. fort
of Novi Zrin, Zrinski mausoleum in Šenkovec etc.). A part of
research should be conducted over the original written and visual material,
a part in field work. This research is particularly interesting in studies
of material leads, providing an insight into interrelations between cultural
spheres of influence in Podravina multiple-bordered region, but outside this
region too.
23. Marginal groups and Podravina multiple-bordered region
Particularly
interesting world of marginal groups is related to population migrations.
This research should try to define and classify marginal and other excluded
groups, and probe into institutions of social prevention.
24. Epidemics, diseases, hunger, flooding, earthquakes and fires in
Podravina multiple-bordered region
This
research should cover these phenomena, which have negative, adverse effects
not only on population, but on the regions they affected.
25. Co-operatives and urbiar relations – changes in legislation and
everyday life of peasants up to mid 20th century
A
part of agrarian population lived in co-operatives and up to mid 19th
century urbiar relations were in place. This research, apart from changes in
legislation, should cover everyday life of peasants. A focus should be
placed on 19th and early 20th century.
Problems of different approaches to history in
Podravina multiple-bordered region
In
the area of Podravina multiple-bordered region, the history of imperial
systems, as well as their conflicts, different interests etc., have a
history of their own; even today; it’s possible to view it from several
viewpoints or with innovative approaches, on the margins of history of the
very region, sometimes even without considering the region itself
(conditionally). Yet, the history of Podravina multibordered region is,
above all, the history of human settlements in this region in socio-cultural
and any other sense of the word; either side of the border(s), across and
beyond all borders, to the levels of borders’ “trivialities” in
everday life of inhabitants here.
Comparative history of Podravina multiple bordered region
History
of Podravina multiple bordered region must be researched by using methods of
comparative history. the past history of this region from any view, either
civilizational, cultural or any other, has its own horizons. It confronts
with the same questions in different ways, however, it’s important to
compare them all the time. Having in mind new possibilities in development
of contemporary world historiography, it’s obvious that use of comparative
methods provides a multitude of open challenges. There are many different
triborders, four -borders etc. Each of them is a unique, separate case of
its own, yet each with its structural complexity in a long historic period
unavoidably includes expiriences competeley comparable. Most European
multiple borders were formed in imperial conflicts of considerable length,
yet in order that some regions indeed become a multiple-bordered region, it
takes its natural environment, socio-economic and socio-cultural structures
to integrate and dissintegrate. All these mutliple-bordered regions are so
much structurally complex, that in European New Era times each conflict in
such a region would, either directly or indirectly, inflict long-lasting
consequences in Europe; or, avoiding conflicts in such a region would
ultimately mean long-term consequences for those ethnic communities, who
share the region with others. In this respect, history of multiple-bordered
regions has always had some key issues of European history, at least in
Europe’s own view, expanding possibilities to apply a comparative method.[13]
Our “Podravina” scientific magazine for multidisciplinary
research, in its own limited scope, aims at achieving this. [14]
Instead of a conclusion – history of Podravina multiple-bordered region: a
challenge beyond limits of traditional disciplines
This
side of Podravina multiple-bordered history is in many ways a
"transdisciplinary" one: on one hand, it means that it cannot be
levelled to any individual, traditional historiographic discipline; on the
other hand, as a rule it must use methods and research possibilities found
in a number of disciplines, from historical demography, h.geography,
socio-cultural history, historical anthropology, rural and urban history,
military history - all the way to environmental history, etc. With that, we
need to perform a number of micro-historic research studies, which will try
to discover ( in relatively small space, in the expieriences of relatively
small human communities) extremely complex history of events. Unlike
micro-history, targeting relatively homogenous human communities,
micro-history of Podravina multiple-bordered region is –from the start –
aimed at research of relatively, or extremely heterogenous human
communities. If such communities are not that in socio-economic sense, then
they must be so in socio-cultural or socio-religious sense. Here we don’t
have individual disciplines in humanistic or social studies that could
absorb such a complex issue. This is why in this research we need to focus
on “great topics” of high importance to represent the problem in its
entirety; on the other hand, issues innovative enough to start a whole
series of multidisciplinary researches.[15]
Most parts of material and intellectual heritage that existed throughout the
past centuries in Podravina multiple-bordered region; today it represents an
important part of cultural-historical foundations of this region; therefore,
this research will have a practical value and application in its possible
revitalization and/or revaluation.
[1]
At University of
[2]
On project Triplex Confinium, comp. D. Roksandić, Triplex Conifinium,
Prilozi, 30,
[3] Within the project «Triplex Confinium – hrvatska višegraničja u euromediteranskom kontekstu» in 2001. we had a project «Podravska višegraničja» or rather «Podravsko višegraničje» (Podravina multiple-bordered region) http://www.ffzg.unizg.hr/pov/zavod/triplex/dravavalleyhrv.htm
[4] H. Petrić, On Podravina historiographyi, Podravina, vol. 3, no. 5, Koprivnica 2004.
[5] Part of collected bibliography was published in the book by D. Feletar, H. Petrić, Bibliographia Podraviana – Selected publications on Podravini, Koprivnica 2001.
[6] These societies have their own web pages here http://www.podravina.net/; http://www.krizevci.net/povijesno-drustvo/
[7] D. Roksandić, Triplex Conifinium, Prilozi, 30, str. 43-61.
[8] The project «Podravsko višegraničje» (Podravina multiple-bordered region), as a part of an international research project «Triplex Confinium» in 2003 in Koprivnica organized an international scientific conference «Environmental history of Podravina multiple-bordered region». Exceprts and summaries from the conference are available on the web page http://www.podravina.net/Radovi/radovi.html.
[9] This is why in 2002 the Center for economic/social history at Dept. of Croatian history at Zagreb Univ.School of Liberal Arts was established , see at http://www.ffzg.unizg.hr/pov/zavod/eksoc.htm
[10] In 2005, a Society for environmental and economic history was founded, and a scientific magazine started “Economics and economic history”, see at http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekonomska_i_ekohistorija.
[11]
Since early
2005, at Ministry for education, science and sports of Croatia, in
collaboration with Slovenia’s Ministry of academic education, science
and technology have a joint research project
«Marketplaces and feudal estates along the Rivers Dravu and Mura
in early New Era (from around 15th to 18th century»;
Croatian part is led by prof. dr. Drago Roksandić from Zagreb, Slovenia
part by doc. dr. Andrej Hozjan from Maribor.
[12] Special project «Podravina multiple-bordered region” is a part of an international research project «Triplex Confinium» and in 2002 organized in Križevci an international scientific conference «Ethnic confessional changes in Križevačka County and Varaždin Generalate in early New Era (around 1450 - 1800) ». http://www.krizevci.net/povijesno-drustvo/hr/novosti.html
[13] D. Roksandić, Triplex Conifinium, Prilozi, 30, str. 43-61. English version is available at htttp://www.ffzg.hr/pov/zavod/triplex/goalstc.htm.
[14] The magazine was started in 2002 in Koprivnica by apublishing house «Meridijani». Until now, they have published 7 volumes..
[15] D. Roksandić, Triplex Conifinium, Prilozi, 30, str. 43-61.
Triplex Confinum web pages are created and maintained by Nataša Štefanec